Stratigraphic relationship between the Quebrada de losColorados and Angastaco Formations(Paleogene-Neogene), Calchiquies Valleys, Salta (Argentina): its significance in the analysis of the Pallogastilla Group basin

Authors

  • Cecilia del Papa CICTERRA, CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611, X5016GCA Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Fernando Hongn IBIGEO, CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Salta. Mendoza 2, 4400 Salta, Argentina.
  • Patricio Payrola Bosio IBIGEO, CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Salta. Mendoza 2, 4400 Salta, Argentina.
  • Jaime Powell CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Miguel Lillo 205, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.
  • Virginia Deraco CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Miguel Lillo 205, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.
  • Claudia Herrera CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Miguel Lillo 205, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.

Keywords:

Angular unconformity, Hypostratotype, Eocene, Foreland basin, Northwestern Argentina.

Abstract

The sedimentary record of the Andean orogenic basins in the Calchaquies Valleys (Fig. 1), consists of nearly 6000 m of an overall coarsening and thickening upward clastic succession (Díaz and Malizzia, 1983) known as the Payogastilla Group. The Payogatilla Group is composed of the Quebrada de losColorados, Angastaco, Palo Pintado and San Felipe Formations (Díaz and Malizzia, 1983; Díaz et al., 1987 - see Fig. 2). Our investigation and previous research in the Quebrada de losColorados Formation (e.g. Galli and Hernández, 1999; Coutand et al., 2006; Carrapa et al., 2011a,b; Galli et al., 2011) allowed the identification of several unconformity surfaces, including an angular relationship between the Quebrada de losColorados Formation and the underlying Salta Group. Moreover, the identification of an intra-formational unconformity led us to the reconsideration of the stratigraphic scheme of the Payogastilla Group. Here, we address the regional stratigraphic relations of the Quebrada de losColorados Formation, the lower unit of the Payogastilla Group, in order to update the knowledge and to discuss the validity of the present stratigraphic framework. Along the Calchaquies Valleys, the Quebrada de losColorados Formation rests on different units of the Salta Group. The more frequent relation is with the uppermost unit, the Lumbrera Formation (Fig. 3), but in some areas, for example at Saladillo, the Quebrada de losColorados Formation rests in angular relationship on the Maíz Gordo Formation (del Papa et al., 2004), as in the Esquina Azul locality (Fig. 4). In the cerroBayo site, the Quebrada de losColorados Formation lies also upon the Maíz Gordo Formation but few meters laterally directly overlays the Mealla Formation (Figs. 2 and 4). In other places, like in the Pucará valley (Fig. 1), the Quebrada de losColorados overlays the Pirgua Subgroup (Villanueva García, 1992; Sabino, 2004). These variable stratigraphic relationships are key features that document the tectonic inversion of the Salta Group contemporaneous with the Quebrada de losColorados sedimentation.

The Quebrada de losColorados Formation consists of red fine-grained floodplain facies and sandy to gravelly clastic fluvial channels facies (Fig. 6). The original description of this unit includes an eolian succession in the upper section (Díaz and Malizzia, 1983). In some localities, like at Tin Tin and Tonco (Fig. 1), the eolian and fluvio-eolian successions have thicknesses ranging from 450 to 600 m (Starck and Vergani, 1996; del Papa et al., 2013) representing a very distinctive erg record. The contact with the underlying fluvial deposits is sharp and a calcretepaleosol (Fig. 5) is locally recognized suggesting the presence of an unconformity within the Quebrada de losColorados Formation. Moreover, this fluvio-eolian succession has a transitional contact with the overlying fluvial conglomeratic facies of the Angastaco Formation. This stratigraphic relation suggests that the former could be formally included within the Angastaco Formation. Thus we propose a redefinition of the Angastaco Formation (Díaz and Malizzia, 1983; nom. transl. Díaz et al., 1987); including the fluvio-eolian succession as the basal Tin Tin Member and to return to the previously defined Las Flechas Member. We propose the Tin Tin area (25º13’51.6’’ Lat. S and 66º00’58.5’’ Log. W - 25°16’12’’ Lat. S and 66°2’39.45’’ Log. W) as stratotype area (Fig. 7). In this locality, pale red silty sandstones to siltstones overlie coarse conglomeratic strata (Figs. 5 and 6) and are overlain by white eolian sandstones that grade to gray conglomeratic strata of the Angastaco Formation sensuDíaz and Malizzia (1983). The age of the Tin Tin Member is considered late Oligocene to early Miocene according to the 21 Ma U/Pb zircon datings (Carrapa et al., 2011a; del Papa et al., 2013).

Finally we propose the Quebrada Grande loca- lity (25º12’59.1’’ Lat. S and 66º01’33.1’’ Log. W), along state route Nº 42, Tin Tin area, Calchaquí Valley (Fig. 7) as hypostratotype of the Quebrada de losColorados Formation. In this locality, this unit rests unconformably, and locally through an angular unconformity, on the Lumbrera Formation (Salta Group, Figs. 2, 3 and 4). In this area the formation is 792 m thick and is characterized by two coarsening upward successions of red siltstone, lenticular to shallow lenticular coarse sandstones and horizontally stratified conglomerates (Fig. 5). Based on mammalian biostratigraphy recorded at sites in Cerro Bayo, Tin Tin and Luracatao (Fig. 1) the age of the Quebrada de losColorados Formation is Casamayoran (sub-age Barrancan), SALMA, sugges- ting a Middle Eocene age for the basal levels (Powell et al., 2011).

In summary, we propose that the fluvio-eolian section of the Quebrada de losColorados Formation should be incorporated into the Angastaco Forma- tion, as the Tin Tin Member. This modification will simplify recognition in the field, mapping, and genetic interpretation of these foreland basin deposits.

References

Amos, S., 1994. International Stratigraphic Guide. A Guide to Stratigraphic Classification, Terminology and Procedure. 2nd edition, International Union of Geological Sciences and Geological Society of America, 214 pp.

Blasco, G., E. Zappettini y F. Hongn, 1996. Hoja Geológica 2566-I, San Antonio de los Cobres, Mapa escala 1:250.000. Secretaría de Minería de la Nación, Dirección Nacional del Servicio Geológico, Boletín Nº 217, 126 pp. Buenos Aires.

Brackebush, L., 1883. Estudio sobre la Formación Petrolífera de Jujuy. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina T15:19-47.

Camacho de Alcalde, M., 1977. Estudio geológico del borde oriental de los Valles Calchaquíes entre Amblayo y San Carlos (provincia de Salta). Revista del Instituto de Geología y Minería de Jujuy 2:71-103.

Carrapa, B. y P. DeCelles, 2008. Eocene exhumation and basin development in the Puna of northwestern Argentina. Tectonics 27, TC1015, doi: 10.1029/2007TC002127.

Carrapa, B., J. Trimble y D. Stockli, 2011a. Patterns and timing of exhumation and deformation in the Eastern Cordillera of NW Argentina revealed by (U-Th)/He thermochronology. Tectonics 30, TC3003, doi:10.1029/2010TC002707.

Carrapa, B., S. Bywater-Reyes, P. DeCelles, E. Mortimer y G.E. Gehrels, 2011b. Late Eocene–Pliocene basin evolution in the Eastern Cordillera of northwestern Argentina (25°- 26°S): regional implications for Andean orogenic wedge development. Basin Research 23: 1-20.

Comité Argentino de Estratigrafía, 1992. Código Argentino de Estratigrafía. Asociación Geológica Argentina, Serie B, Didáctica y Complementaria 20:1-64. Buenos Aires.

Coutand, I., B. Carrapa, A. Deeken, A. Schmitt, E. Sobel y M. Strecker, 2006. Propagation of orographic barriers along an active range front: insights from sandstone petrography and detrital apatite fission-track thermochronology in the intramontaneAngastaco basin, NW-Argentina. BasinResearch 18:1-26.

del Papa, C., F. Hongn, I. Petrinovic y R. Domínguez, 2004.Evidencias de deformación pre-miocena media asociada al antepaís andino en la Cordillera Oriental (24° 35’S - 6° 12’O). Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 59:506-509.

del Papa C., A. Kirschbaum, J. Powell, A. Brod, F. Hongn yM. Pimentel, 2010. Sedimentological, geochemical and paleontological insights applied to continental omission surfaces: a new approach for reconstructing Eocene foreland basin in NW Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 29:327-345.

del Papa, C., F. Hongn, J. Powell, P. Payrola, M. Do Campo,M.R. Strecker, I. Petrinovic, A. K. Schmitt y R. Pereyra, 2013. Middle Eocene-Oligocene broken foreland evolution in the Andean Calchaquí Valley, NW Argentina: insights from stratigraphic, structural and provenance studies. BasinResearch 25:574-593.

Díaz, J.I., 1987. Estratigrafía y sedimentología del Terciario Superior de la región comprendida por los valles de los ríos Calchaquí y Guachipas (Provincia de Salta). Tesis Doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, 122 pp. (inédito).

Díaz, J.I. y D. Malizzia, 1983. Estudio geológico y sedimentológico del Terciario Superior del valle Calchaquí, Salta. BoletínSedimentológico 2:8-28.

Díaz, J.I., D. Malizzia y G. Bossi, 1987. Análisis estratigráfico del Grupo Payogastilla. X Congreso Geológico Argentino Actas II:113-116, Tucumán.

Do Campo, M., C. del Papa, O. Nieto, F. Hongn y I. Petrinovic, 2010. Integrated analysis for constraining palaeoclimatic and volcanic influences on clay-mineral assemblages in orogenic basins (Palaeogene Andean foreland, NorthwesternArgentina). Sedimentary Geology 228:98-112.

Galli, C. y R. Hernández, 1999. Evolución de la cuenca de antepaís desde la zona de la Cumbre Calchaquí hasta la Sierra de Santa Bárbara, Eoceno inferior – Mioceno medio, provincia de Salta, Argentina. En F. Colombo, I. Querault, e I. Petrinovic (Eds.), Geología de los Andes Centrales Meridionales: El Noroeste Argentino. Acta Geológica Hispánica 34:167-184.

Galli, C, A. Ramírez, J. Reynolds, J. Viramonte, B. Idleman y C. Barrientos, 2011. Procedencia de los depósitos del Grupo Payogastilla (Cenozoico), río Calchaquí, provincia de Salta. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 68:261-276.

Herrera, C.M, 2013. Los Dasipódidos (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Paleógeno del noroeste argentino. Aspectos Evolutivos y Bioestratigráficos. Tesis Doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, 195 pp. (inédito).

Herrera C.M., J.E Powell, y C. del Papa, 2012. Un nuevo Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra) de la Formación Casa Grande (Eoceno) de la provincia de Jujuy. Ameghiniana 49:267-271.

Hongn, F. y R. Seggiaro, 2001. Hoja Geológica 2566-III, Cachi, escala 1:250.000. Instituto de Recursos Minerales. Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, Boletín 248, 96 pp. Buenos Aires.

Hongn, F., C. del Papa, I. Petrinovic, R. Mon y J. Powell, 2006. Sedimentación sintectónica en la base del Grupo Payogastilla (¿Paleógeno?-Neógeno), Valle Calchaquí norte, Salta. Revistade la Asociación Geológica Argentina, Publicación Especial Serie D 10:84-90.

Hongn, F., C. del Papa, J. Powell, I. Petrinovic, R. Mon y V. Deraco, 2007. Middle Eocene deformation and sedimentation in the Puna-Eastern Cordillera transition (23°-26°S): Control by preexisting heterogeneities on the pattern of initial Andean shortening. Geology 35:271-274.

Hongn, F., C. del Papa, J. Powell, P. Payrola, I. Petrinovic y R. Mon, 2011. Fragmented Paleogene foreland basin in the Valles Calchaquíes, NW of Argentina. En J.A. Salfity y R. Marquillas (Eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Central Andes of Argentina. SCS Publisher: 189-209. Salta.

Jordan, T. y R. Alonso, 1987. Cenozoic stratigraphy and basin tectonics of the Andes Mountains, 20º–28º south latitude. American Association of Petroleoum Geologists Bulletin 71:49- 64.

Marret, R., R. Allmendinger, R. Alonso y R. Drake, 1994. Late Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Puna Plateau and adjacent foreland, northwestern Argentine Andes. Journal of South American EarthSciences 7:179-207.

Mauri, E. 1948. Observaciones geológicas en el sudoeste de la provincia de Salta (Departamentos de Cafayate, San Carlos, Molinos, Guachitas y La Viña). Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales, (inédito). Buenos Aires

PayrolaBosio, P., J. Powell, C. del Papa y F. Hongn, 2009. Middle Eocene deformation-sedimentation in the Luracatao Valley: Tracking the beginning of the foreland basin of Northwestern Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 28:142- 154.

PayrolaBosio, P., C. del Papa, F. Hongn y J. Powell, 2010. Revisión estratigráfica del Valle de Luracatao (NO Argentino): registro del inicio de la cuenca de antepaís cenozoica. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 67:307-316.

Powell, J.E., M.J. Babot, D.A. García López, M.V. Deraco y C. Herrera, 2011. Eocene vertebrates of Northwestern Argentina: Annotated list. En J.A. Salfity, y R. Marquillas, (Eds.), CenozoicGeology of the Central Andes of Argentina. SCS Publisher: 349-370. Salta.

Russo, A. 1948. Levantamiento geológico en la cuenca del río Calchaquí, departamento de Molinos, provincia de Salta. Yaci- mientos Petrolíferos Fiscales, (inédito), 34 pp. Buenos Aires.

Russo, A. y A. Serraiotto, 1978. Contribución al conocimiento de la Estratigrafía Terciaria del Noroeste Argentino. VII Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas I: 715-730, Neuquén.

Sabino, I.F., 2004. Estratigrafía de la Formación La Yesera (Cretácico): Base del relleno sinrift del Grupo Salta, noroeste argentino. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 59:341-359.

Salfity, J.A. y C.R. Monaldi, 2006. Hoja Geológica 2566-IV, Metán, escala 1:250.000. Instituto de Recursos Minerales. Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, Boletín 319, 74 pp. Buenos Aires.

Starck, D. y G. Vergani, 1996. Desarrollo tectosedimentario del Cenozoico en el sur de la provincia de Salta. XIII Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas I:433-452, Buenos Aires.

Stelzner, A., 1885. Beitragezurgeologie und palaontologie der ArgentinischenRepublik und des angrensenden, swischendem 32º und 33ºS. Br. GelegenenTeiles der Chilenischen Cordillera. CasselundBerlin trad. al catellano (1924), Acta 8, Academia Nacional Córdoba.

Stipanicic, P.N. y C.A. Marsicano, 2002. Léxico Estratigráfico de la Argentina: Triásico. Asociación Geológica Argentina, Serie “B” Didáctica y Complementaria VIII, 370 pp. Buenos Aires.

Vilela, C., 1954. Notas sobre la estratigrafía del Terciario en el Valle del Río Calchaquí. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 9:169-171.

Vilela C. y J. García, 1978. Descripción Geológica de la Hoja 9e, Amblayo. Servicio Geológico Nacional, Boletín 150, 67 pp. Buenos Aires.

Villanueva García, A., 1992. Geología del Valle de Pucará, con especial referencia a la sedimentología y estratigrafía de las unidades cretácicas-terciarias, Provincia de Salta, República Argentina Tesis Doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, 123 pp. (inédito).

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

del Papa, C. ., Hongn, F. ., Payrola Bosio, P. ., Powell , J. ., Deraco, V. ., & Herrera, C. . (2021). Stratigraphic relationship between the Quebrada de losColorados and Angastaco Formations(Paleogene-Neogene), Calchiquies Valleys, Salta (Argentina): its significance in the analysis of the Pallogastilla Group basin. atin merican ournal of edimentology and asin nalysis, 20(1), 51–64. etrieved from https://lajsba.sedimentologia.org.ar/lajsba/article/view/152

Issue

Section

Research Papers