Lithofacies description and genetic interpretation of San Luis Formation Metaconglomerates (Upper Proterozoic - Cambrian) in Sierra de San Luis, Argentina

Authors

  • Juan Matías Perón Orrillo Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales Departamento de Geología. Ejercito de Los Andes 950, D5700HHW San Luis, Argentina. CONICET - CCT San Luis.
  • David Rivarola Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales Departamento de Geología. Ejercito de Los Andes 950, D5700HHW San Luis, Argentina.

Keywords:

Metaconglomerate, Debrite, Ice-rafted diamictite, San Luis Formation, Sierras Pampeanas.

Abstract

The Sierra de San Luis is part of the southern region of Sierras Pampeanas and it is composed of an igneous-metamorphic basement, mostly generated during the Pampean and Famatinian orogenies. The low-grade metamorphic rocks belong to the San Luis Formation (Prozzi & Ramos, 1988), and they include phyllites, slates, metapsammites, metaconglomerates and acid metavolcanic rocks. This unit is exposed in the south-central sector of the Sierra de San Luis, across two NNE – SSW elongated outcrops called Eastern and Western Belts, which are 50 and 40 km long, respectively (Fig. 1) (Ortiz Suárez et al., 1992). The complex deformational structure of the San Luis Formation hinders its original thickness, estimated at a minimum of 3500 m without decompaction (von Gosen and Prozzi, 1996). According to different dating techniques, the age of the San Luis Formation would span between the Late Neoproterozoic to the Cambrian (Söllner et al., 2000; Drobe et al., 2009, 2011; Casquet et al., 2014). The aim of this paper is to describe and interpret the preserved sedi- mentological features of coarse-grained units within the San Luis Formation (metaconglomerates), in order to shed light into depositional processes and systems. This research is particularly important due to the little knowledge available about the protolite sedimentologic and stratigraphic characteristics of the unit. Additionally, metaconglomerates might constitute a relevant element of stratigraphic corre- lation between different exposures of the San Luis Formation, thus providing time lines that are not possible to obtain by other means. Three main metaconglomerates are reported in this study, one for the Eastern Belt, and two for the Western Belt (Fig. 2). Conventional sedimentological information was collected in the field while logging stratigraphic section. The mineralogy and petrology of the coarse clastic fraction were studied in the field and samples of mudstones and sandstones were collected for microscopic analysis (Table 1). Cañada Honda Metaconglomerate (Prozzi, 1990). This unit is exposed in the Eastern Belt, at Tres Pasos locality(Figs.1,3).This metasedimentite is 270m thick and 10 km along strike. Here, this metaconglomerate has been divided into three sections. The lower section is 60 m thick and consists of disorganized, matrix-supported paraconglomerates (Cfm) (Fig. 4), with up to 30% of framework of pebbles to boulders, and over 70% of muddy matrix with low proportion of sand. Beds commonly have irregular geometries, probably due to the metamorphic deformation, and are thick to very thick bedded. They are interbedded with massive mudstones (Fm), which are up to 0.5 m thick. The second section is 40 m thick and is composed of lenses of normal-graded sabulites (Sg) with erosive bases and scarce lateral development, interbedded with massive mudstones (Fm) (Fig. 5). The upper section is 170 m thick and comprises two paraconglomerates. One of them (Caa) has a 40% of disorganized framework of pebbles and a mud–rich sandy matrix dominated by fine to coarse sand. The other one (Cac) has up to 70% of framework and a mud–rich sandy matrix dominated by fine to coarse sand, with disorganized fabric and uncommon inverse gradation in the first 10 cm of some thick beds. Moreover, coarse pebbles and cobbles (5 to 20 cm long) are commonly observed protruding from the top of the beds (Fig. 7b). Both massive paraconglomerates (Caa and Cac) have tabular geometries with thick to very thick beds. They have flat to slightly erosive bases and transitional tops to fine-grained wackes (Vf) (Fig. 8), which are mostly tabular, thin- to medium-bedded layers. These facies are capped by thin, laminated mudstones (Fl). Four facies associations are recognized in the Cañada Honda Metaconglomerate (Fig. 13a-d). Association Cfm–Fm is interpreted as deposits from cohesive debris flows (Lowe, 1982; Mulder and Alexander, 2001), ending with settling processes associated with residuary particles suspended above those flows (Fig. 13a). Association Sg-Fm is interpreted to reflect deposition from waning turbidity currents with decreasing density (Lowe, 1982) (Fig. 13b). Associations Cac-Vf-Fl and Caa-Vf-Fl are interpreted as deposits of hyperconcentrated cohesionless flows (Mulder and Alexander, 2001), ending with settling processes associated to residuary particles suspended above those flows (Fig. 13c, d). All together, the four facies associations of this metaconglomerate would have deposited in the canyon area of a slope depositional system. Arroyo Curtiembre Metaconglomerate (Ramos et al., 1996). This unit is exposed in the headwaters of the homonymous creek in the northern sector of the Western Belt, where it attains 115 m in thickness and it extends over 2 km along strike (Fig. 9). It is composed of laminated pebbly mudstones (FGl), with 15% of framework of coarse pebbles and 85% of muddy matrix (Fig. 10). The clasts disturb the lamination at their bases and are interpreted as dropstones (Fig. 11a). Beds have tabular geometry and are medium- to thick-bedded. They are typically interbedded with laminated mudstones (Fl) in strata of similar thickness, with transitional contacts (Fig. 11b). Systematic vertical relationship between facies Fl and FGl (Fig. 13e) is inferred to reflect deposition from rain-out of debris, from icebergs and seasonal sea-ice, associated with continuous settling of suspended sediment in low-density plumes, in the maximum proglacial zone. Cerro Blanco Metaconglomerate (new name). This coarse-grained unit is exposed in the eastern side of the homonymous hill in the Western Belt, where it is 35 m thick and no more than 300 m wide. It is composed of laminated pebbly mudstones (FSl) with up to 15% of framework of granules to coarse pebbles (0.2 - 3 cm) and over 85% of muddy matrix (Fig. 12). As in the previous case, the clasts slightly disturb the lamination at their bases, and are, thus, interpreted as dropstones (Fig. 12). Beds are tabular, less than to 2 m thick, and they vertically grade into laminated mudstones (Fl). The close relationship between facies FSl and Fl (Fig. 13f) suggests that this association was formed by the same processes that accumulated the sediments of the Arroyo Curtiembre metasedimentite; that is to say rain-out of debris from icebergs with season fluctuations. In this location, however, there are a lower proportion of pebbles versus matrix and, in average, a smaller grain size (granules vs. pebbles). Considering the marked similarity in facies between Cerro Blanco Metaconglomerate and Arroyo Cur- tiembre Metaconglomerate, we conclude they would represent the same stratigraphic interval.

References

Aceñolaza, F. y G. Aceñolaza, 2005. La Formación Puncoviscana y unidades estratigráficas vinculadas en el Neoproterozoico – Cámbrico temprano del Noroeste Argentino. Latin American Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis 12:65-87.

Aparicio González, P.A., M.C. Moya y A. Impiccini, 2010. Estratigrafía de las rocas metasedimentarias (Neoproterozoico – Cámbrico) de la Sierra de Mojotoro, Cordillera Oriental Argentina. Latin American Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis 17:65-83.

Astini, R.A., F.M. Dávila, G. Collo y F. Martina, 2005. La Formación La Aguadita (Ordovícico Medio – Superior?): su implicancia en la evolución temprana del Famatina y como parte del orógeno oclóyico en el oeste de Argentina. En: J.A. Dahlquist, E. Baldo y P.H. Alasino (Eds.): Geología de la Provincia de La Rioja, Precámbrico-Paleozoico. Asociación Geológica Argentina, Serie D, Publicación Especial 8:67-84.

Bennett, M.M. y N.F. Glasser, 2009. Glacial geology: ice sheets and landforms, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Reino Unido, 364 pp.

Brodtkorb, M., N. Pezzutti, S. Poma y R. Fernández, 2009. Geoquímica y petrología de las metavolcanitas cámbricas de la Sierra de San Luis. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 65:429-445.

Casquet, C., E. Baldo, C. Galindo, R.J. Pankhurst, C.W. Rapela, y M.C. Fanning, 2014. Las vulcanitas de la Formación San Luis (Sierra de San Luis, Argentina): Nueva edad (SHRIMP) y geoquímica isotópica (Sr - Nd). XVIII Congreso Geológico Argentino Actas:345, Córdoba.

Crowell, J., 1957. Origin of pebbly mudstones. Geological Society of America Bulletin 68:993-1010.

Drobe, M., M. López de Luchi, A. Steenken, R. Frei, R. Naumann, S. Siegesmund y K. Wemmer, 2009. Provenance of the late Proterozoic to early Cambrian metaclastic sediments of the Sierra de San Luis (Eastern Sierras Pampeanas) and Cordillera

Oriental, Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 28:239-262.

Drobe, M., M. López de Luchi, A. Steenken, K. Wemmer, R. Naumann, R. Frei y S. Siegesmund, 2011. Geodynamic evolution of the Eastern Sierras Pampeanas (Central Argentina) based on geochemical, Sm–Nd, Pb–Pb and SHRIMP data. International Journal of Earth Science (Geol Rundsch) 100:631-657.

Edwards, M., 1986. Glacial Environments. En: H.G. Reading (Ed.), Sedimentary Enviroments and Facies, 2nd edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford:445-470.

Fuentes, G., 2010. Análisis Sedimentológico y Estratigráfico de las metasedimentitas de la Formación San Luis (Proterozoico Tardío – Paleozoico Temprano) de la zona central de la Faja Occidental de la Sierra de San Luis, Argentina, Tesis de Licenciatura, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, 77 pp. (inédito).

Hack, M., M.K. de Brodtkorb, R. Höll y A. Brodtkorb, 1991. Geología y consideraciones genéticas de los yacimientos scheelíticos entre el dique la Florida y Pampa del Tamboreo, provincia de San Luis. En: M.K. de Brodtkorb (Ed.) Geología de yacimientos de wolframio de las provincias de San Luis y Córdoba, Argentina. Instituto de Recursos Minerales, Universidad Nacional de la Plata, 1:113-152.

Hladil, J., 1991. The Upper Ordovician dropstones of Central Bohemia and their paleogravity significance. Véstník Úst?edního Ústavu Geologického 66:65-74.

Kawai, T., B.F. Windley, M. Terabayashi, H. Yamamoto, Y. Isozaki, y S. Maruyama, 2008. Neoproterozoic glaciation in the mid-oceanic realm: An example from hemi-pelagic mudstones on Llanddwyn Island, Anglesey, UK. Gondwana Research 14:105-114.

López de Luchi, M.G., M.E. Cerredo, S. Siegesmund, A. Steenken y K. Wemmer, 2003. Provenance and tectonic setting of the protoliths of the metamorphic complexes of Sierra de San Luis. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 58:525–540. Lowe, D.R., 1982. Sediment gravity flows: II. Depositional models with special reference to the deposits of high-density turbidity currents. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 52:279-297.

Mohrig, D., K.X. Whipple, M. Hondzo, C. Ellis, y G. Parker, 1998. Hydroplaning of subaqueous debris flows. Geological Society of America Bulletin 110:387-394.

Mulder, T. y J. Alexander, 2001. The physical character of subaqueous sedimentary density flows and their deposits. Sedimentology 48:269-299.

Mutti, E., 1992. Turbidite sandstones. AGIP - Istituto di Geologia, Università di Parma, San Donato Milanese, 275 pp.

Mutti, E., G. Davoli, S. Mora y L. Papani, 1994. Internal stacking patterns of ancient turbidite systems from collisional basins. En: P. Weimer, A.H. Bouma y B. Perkins (Eds.), Submarine Fans and Turbidite Systems. GCS SEPM 15th Annual Research Conference, 257-268.

Ortiz Suárez, A., 1999. Geología y petrología del área de San Francisco del Monte de Oro. San Luis. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, 259 pp. (inédito).

Ortiz Suárez, A., C. Prozzi y E. Llambías, 1992. Geología de la parte sur de la sierra de San Luis y granitoides asociados, Argentina. Estudios Geológicos 48:209-381.

Perón Orrillo, J.M., D. Rivarola, A. Ortiz Suárez, D. Olsen, G. Fuentes, C. Grasso, M. Icazatti y P. Perocco, 2012. Análisis paleoambiental y evolutivo de la Formación San Luis (Proterozoico Superior – Paleozoico Inferior), San Luis. XIII

Reunión Argentina de Sedimentología, Resúmenes:167-168, Salta.

Pickering, K., D. Stow, M. Watson y R. Hiscott, 1986. Deep-water facies, processes and models: a review and clasification scheme for modern and ancient sediments. Earth Science Review 23:75-174.

Posamentier, H.W. y R.G. Walker, 2006. Deep-water turbidites and submarine fans. En: H.W. Posamentier y R.G. Walker (Eds.), Facies models revisited. SEPM Special Publication 84:399-520.

Prozzi, C., 1990. Consideraciones acerca del Basamento de San Luis. XI Congreso Geológico Argentino Actas I:452-455, San Juan.

Prozzi, C. y A. Ortiz Suárez, 1994. Rocas metamórficas de bajo grado en las Sierras Pampeanas (Argentina). 7º Congreso Geológico Chileno Actas II:1167-1171, Concepción.

Prozzi, C. y G. Ramos, 1988. La Formación San Luis. Primeras Jornadas de Trabajo de Sierras Pampeanas Abstracts, 1 p., San Luis.

Prozzi, C. y U. Zimmermann, 2005. Provenance of Metasedi- mentary Successions of the Sierra de San Luis: First Results. XVI Congreso Geológico Argentino Actas en CD, La Plata.

Ramos, G., C. Prozzi y A. Ortiz Suárez, 1996. Conglomerados del basamento de Sierras Pampeanas. XIII Congreso Geológico Argentino y III Congreso de Exploración de Hidrocarburos Actas I:607-617, Buenos Aires.

Reading H.G., 1996. Sedimentary Enviroments: Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy, 3rd ed. Blackwell Science, Reino Unido, 704 pp.

Rivarola, D. y A. Ortiz Suárez, 2008. Los metaconglomerados de la Formación San Luis. Origen glacimarino? XII Reunión Argentina de Sedimentología Acta:152, Buenos Aires.

Rivarola, D., A. Ortiz Suárez y J.M. Perón Orrillo, 2011. Facies de diamictitas glaciarias en la Formación San Luis (Proterozoico superior – Paleozoico inferior?), implicancias cronológicas. XVIII Congreso Geológico Argentino Actas:227-228, Neuquén.

Sánchez Bettucci, L. y V. Ramos, 1999. Aspectos geológicos de las rocas metavolcánicas y metasedimentarias del Grupo Lavalleja, sudeste de Uruguay. Revista Brasileira de Geociéncias 29:557-570.

Sanders, J.E., 1965. Primary sedimentary structures formed by turbidity currents and related resedimentation mechanisms. En: G.V. Middleton (Ed.), Primary sedimentary structures and their hydrodynamic interpretation. SEPM, Special Publication 12:192-219.

Sato, A.M., P.D. González, y E. Llambías, 2003. Evolución del Orógeno Famatiniano en la Sierra de San Luis: magmatismo de arco, deformación y metamorfismo de bajo a alto grado. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 58:487-504.

Sims, J., T. Ireland, A. Camacho, P. Lyons, P. Pieters, R. Skirrow, P. Stuart Smith y R. Miró, 1998. U-Pb, Th-Pb and Ar- Ar geochronology from the southern Sierras Pampeanas, Argentina: implications for the Palaeozoic tectonic evolution of the western Gondwana margin. En: R. Pankhurst y C.W. Rapela (Eds.), The proto-Andean Margin of Gondwana. Geological Society of London, Special Publication 142:259- 281, London.

Söllner, F., M.K. de Brodtkorb, H. Miller, N. Pezzutti y R. Fernández, 2000. U-Pb zircon ages of metavolcanics rocks from the Sierra de San Luis, Argentina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 55:15-22.

Steenken, A., S. Siegesmund, M.G. López de Luchi, R. Frei y K. Wemmer, 2006. Neoproterozoic to Early Palaeozoic events in the Sierra de San Luis: implications for the Famatinian geodynamics in the Eastern Sierras Pampeanas (Argentina). Journal of the Geological Society 163:965-982.

Teruggi, M., 1982. Diccionario Sedimentológico Volumen 1: Rocas Clásticas y Piroclásticas. Ediciones Científicas Argentinas Librart. Argentina. 104 pp.

von Gosen, W., 1998. The Phyllite and Micaschist Group with associated intrusions in the Sierra de San Luis (Sierras Pampeanas/Argentina) - structural and metamorphic relations. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 11:79-109.

von Gosen, W. y C. Prozzi, 1996. Geology, structure and metamorphism in the area south of La Carolina (Sierra de San Luis, Argentina). XIII Congreso Geológico Argentino y III Congreso de Exploración de Hidrocarburos Actas 2:301-314, Buenos Aires.

von Gosen, W. y C. Prozzi, 1998. Structural evolution of the Sierra de San Luis (Eastern Sierras Pampeanas, Argentina): implications for the Proto- Andean Margin of Gondwana. En: R. Pankhurst y C.W. Rapella (Eds.), The proto-Andean margin of Gondwana. Geological Society of London, Special publication 142:235-258.

Zavala, C., C. Prozzi y H. Freije, 2000. Hallazgo de facies contorníticas en el Proterozoico tardío-Paleozoico temprano de las Sierras Pampeanas, Argentina. II Congreso Latinoa- mericano de Sedimentología y VIII Reunión Argentina de Sedimentología Resúmenes:187-188, Mar del Plata.

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Perón Orrillo, J. M. . ., & Rivarola, D. . (2021). Lithofacies description and genetic interpretation of San Luis Formation Metaconglomerates (Upper Proterozoic - Cambrian) in Sierra de San Luis, Argentina. atin merican ournal of edimentology and asin nalysis, 21(1), 25–48. etrieved from https://lajsba.sedimentologia.org.ar/lajsba/article/view/142

Issue

Section

Research Papers