Microfabrics in eolian sandstones of the De La Cuesta Formation (Permian), Sierra de Narváez, Catamarca Province, Argentina
Keywords:
Clastic microfabric; eolian; Permian.Abstract
In this paper a study of microfabrics occurring in eolian Permian sandstones of the De La Cuesta Formation (Catamarca Province, northwest Argentina) is presented (Fig. 1). The middle part of the De La Cuesta Formation comprises thick and well exposed eolian sandstones, which were deposited in an erg environment during an arid Permian phase recognized in different parts of South America (Spalletti et al., 2011, Fig. 2). Following the scheme proposed by Spalletti et al. (2011) samples were collected from the following sedimentary facies: 1) cross-bedded fine-grained sandstones interpreted as crescent dunes, 2) wedge-shaped cross-bedded sandstones corresponding to longitudinal (seif) dunes, 3) horizontal-laminated or low-angle crosslaminated sandstones, in some cases showing inverse-grading, which would have been deposited in interdune and extradune (eolian sand-sheet) areas, and 4) fine- to very fine-grained sandstones formed in dry and wet interdunes (Figs. 2 and 3). On the basis of texture (grain size, sorting and asymmetry) and microstructures, six microfabrics were recognized (Table 1). Microfabric 1 comprises grainflow-foreset laminae found in large-scale cross-bedded sandstones; this type of microfabric is composed of medium-grained sandstones (less commonly coarse-grained sandstones) with mean values between 300 ? y 460 ? (Table 1). The sandstones are unimodal, moderately well sorted and the grain size distribution is slightly asymmetric (Fig. 5); they are composed of medium-grained sand (55%), fine-grained sand (21%) and coarse-grained sand (24%). Coarse-grained silt is almost entirely absent, and the intergranular space varies from 25% to 27%. This microfabric forms inclined laminae, 3 to 5 cm thick, commonly decreasing in thickness towards the base of the set. Microfabric 2 occurs closely associated with microfabric 1 forming large-scale cross-bedded sets. It corresponds to grainfall deposits and is mainly formed by fine-grained and less frequently by very finegrained sandstones (Table 1 and Fig. 5). Microfabric 2 is mainly composed of fine-grained sand (60%), very fine-grained sand (31%), medium-grained sand (7%) and coarse-grained silt (2%). The laminae are tabular, massive and their thickness range from 0.5 to 4 cm; the intergranular space is lower than microfabric 1 (17%-20%, Table 1 and Fig. 6). Microfabric 3 is made up by laminae of inverse graded sandstones, whose thickness vary from 10 mm to 30 mm, being the intergranular space between 10% and 15% (Figs. 5, 6 and 8). The particle size distributions are unimodal, moderately sorted with mean values in medium-grained sand (250 ? y 300 ?, Fig. 5). In almost all cases, the medium-grained sand prevails (42%), followed by fine-grained sand (38%), coarse-grained sand (13%) and very fine-grained sand (6%); coarse-grained silt is below 1% (Table 1, Fig. 6). This microfabric is interpreted as originated by the migration of eolian ripples that carried an appreciable amount of coarse- and medium-grained sand transported by creeping. Microfabric 4 is characterized by fine-grained unimodal, moderately well sorted sandstones with a slightly asymmetric distribution (Figs 5, 6 and 9). The average grain-size distribution is: fine-grained sand (50%), very fine-grained sand (28%), mediumgrained sand (20%) and coarse-grained sand (1.5%); the percentage of coarse-grained silt ranges from 1% to 8% (Table 1). Microfabric 4 is quite similar to microfabric 3, but it differs in the lack of graded lamination and in a higher proportion of fine-grained sand. As in the case of microfabric 3, this microfabric was probably formed by the migration of eolian ripples, but lacking enough amount of coarse- and medium-grained sand to promote graded structures. Massive very fine-grained and fine-grained sandstones showing adhesion ripples, bioturbation and centimeter-scale deformational structures, correspond to the microfabric 5. This microfabric dominates in dry interdune and extradune deposits. Sandstones are characterized by abundant carbonate (calcite) cement and high intergranular space (28%- 30%). The particle size distribution is unimodal, moderately sorted, and dominated by very finegrained sand (44%) and fine-grained sand (39%), followed by discrete proportions of medium-grained sand (9%) and coarse-grained silt (7%); in all cases the amount of coarse-grained sand is lower than 1% (Table 1 and Fig. 6). Microfabric 6 exhibits the smallest grain-sizes and predominates in wet interdune and extradune deposits. It consists of well sorted, very fine-grained sand (media between 95 and 80 ?). The dominant very fine-grained sand population (72%) is accompanied by coarse-grained silt (17%) and fine-grained sand (10%, Table 1 and Fig. 6). The beds are massive, horizontally laminated or exhibit wavy lamination originated by post-depositional compaction. The mentioned microfabrics appear not randomly distributed, but they form specific associations among the different types of the dune, interdune and extradune deposits (Fig. 10). In the case of dune sandstones, the foresets of large-scale crossbedded units are mainly composed of alternated laminae of microfabrics 1 and 2, which represent the alternation of grainflow and grainfall processes. Less frequently, foresets comprise microfabrics 3 and 4, suggesting the development of lamination produced by migration of ripples on leeward side of dunes. A particular type of dune cross-bedded sets result from the stacking of laminae formed by microfabric 2, pointing out that grainfall of fine- and very fine-grained sand occurs without grainflow events or significant migration of ripples. In such circumstances, cross-laminated sets form pinstripe lamination, suggesting the development of lowangle leeward dune faces. Dry interdunes are chiefly composed of microfabrics 3 and 4, which show that ripple migration is the main mechanism of transport and deposition in this setting; scarce intercalations of microfabric 5 are interpreted as remobilized sand accumulations related to deflation and/or fluvial floods in interdune areas (Fig. 10). Deposits of wet interdunes comprise microfabrics 5 and 6 with minor contributions of microfabrics 3 and 4. Extradunes are formed by thick intervals (tens of meters) of horizontal laminated or low-angle crosslaminated sandstones. In these deposits microfabric analysis allows discriminating between dry and wet extradunes, since the former are characterized by microfabrics 3 and 4, whereas the second are essentially composed of microfabrics 5 and 6. Microfabric studies allow not only obtaining a more complete and precise information on the mechanism of transport and deposition in the eolian system, but also interpreting changes in the petrophysical features of the sandstones (permeability, porosity). Additionally, microfabric analysis can be employed as a useful tool in the description and interpretation of core wells.
References
Aceñolaza, F.G. y M.E. Vergel, 1987. Hallazgo del Pérmico superior fosilífero en el Sistema de Famatina. X Congreso Geológico Argentino Actas III:125-129, San Miguel de Tucumán.
Ahlbrandt, T.S., 1979. Textural parameters of eolian deposits. En E.D. McKee (Ed.), A Study of Global Sand Seas. U. S. Geological Survey Paper 1052:21-51.
Ahlbrandt, T.S. y S.G. Fryberger, 1980. Geologic and paleoecologic studies of the Nebraska Sand Hills. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1120A:1-24.
Al-Masrahy, M.A. y N.P. Mountney, 2015. A classification scheme for fluvial-aeolian system interaction in desert-margin settings. Aeolian Research 17:67-88.
Anderson, R.S., 1990. Aeolian ripples as examples of self-organization in geomorphological systems. Earth Science Reviews 29:77-96.
Anderson, R.S. y P.K. Haff, 1988. Simulation of aeolian saltation. Science 241:820-823. Bagnold, R.A., 1941. The Physics of Wind Blown Sand and Desert Dunes. Methuen & Co., London, 265 pp.
Baudt, J.A., C.M. Scherer, L.F. De Ros y K. Goldberg, 2012. Building more realistic siliciclastic reservoir models through integration of depositional and diagenetic heterogeneities in a flow unit approach. Pesquisas em Geociencias 39:109-125.
Bauer, B.O., C.A. Houser y W.G. Nickling, 2004. Analysis of velocity profile measurements from wind-tunnel experiments with saltation. Geomorphology 59:81-98.
Bigarella, J.J., 1972. Eolian environments: their characteristics, recognition and importance. En J.K. Rigby y W.K. Hamblin (Eds.), Recognition of Ancient Sedimentary Environments. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication 16:12-62.
Bigarella, J.J., 1975. Lagoa dune field, State of Santa Catarina, Brazil-A model of eolian arid pluvial activity. Boletim Paranaense de Geociencias 33:133-167.
Binda, P.L., 1983. On the skewness of some eolian sands from Saudi Arabia. En M.E. Brookfield y T.S. Ahlbrandt (Eds.), Aeolian Sediments and Processes. Developments in Sedimentology 38:27-39.
Brookfield, M.E., 1977. The origin of bounding surfaces in ancient aeolian sandstones. Sedimentology 24:303-332. Bryant, G., G. Monegato y A. Miall, 2013. An example of liquefaction-induced interdune sedimentation from the early Jurassic Navajo Sandstone, USA. Sedimentary Geology 297:50-62.
Chandler, M.A., G. Kocurek, D.J. Goggin y L. Lake, 1989. Effects of stratigraphic heterogeneity on permeability in an aeolian sandstone sequence, Page Sandstone, Northern Arizona. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 73:658- 668.
Ciftci, B.N., A.A. Avianatara, N.F. Hurley y D.R. Kerr, 2004. Outcrop-based three-dimensional modeling of the Tensleep Sandstone at Alkali Creek, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. En G.M. Grammer, P.M. Harris y G.P. Eberli (Eds.), Integration of Outcrop and Modern Analogs in Reservoir Modeling. American Association of Petroleum Geologist Memoir 80:235-259.
Clemmensen, L.B. y K. Abrahamsen, 1983. Aeolian stratification and facies association in desert sediments, Arran Basin (Permian), Scotland. Sedimentology 30:311-339.
Desbois, G., J.L. Urai, P.A. Kukla, J. Konstanty y C. Baerle, 2011. High-resolution 3D fabric and porosity model in a tight gas sandstone reservoir: A new approach to investigate microstructures from mm- to nm-scale combining argon beam cross-sectioning and SEM imaging. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 78:243-257.
Durán, O. y C.B. Andreotti, 2011. On aeolian transport: Grainscale interactions, dynamical mechanisms and scaling laws. Aeolian Research 3:243-270.
Farrell, N.J.C., D. Healy y C.W. Taylor, 2014. Anisotropy of permeability in faulted porous sandstones. Journal of Structural Geology 63:50-67.
Folk, R.L., P.B. Andrews y D. Lewis, 1970. Detrital sedimentary rock classification and nomenclature for use in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 13:937-968.
Fryberger, S.G. y C.J. Schenk, 1981. Wind sedimentation tunnel experiments on the origin of aeolian strata. Sedimentology 28:805-821.
Fryberger, S.G. y C.J. Schenk, 1988. Pin stripe lamination: a distinctive feature of modern and ancient eolian sediments. Sedimentary Geology 55:1-15.
Fryberger, S., T. Ahlbrandt y S. Andrews, 1979. Origin of sedimentary features and significance of low-angle eolian “sand sheet” deposits. Great Sand Dunes National Monument and vicinity, Colorado. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 49:733-746.
Gerety, K.M. y R. Slingerland, 1983. Nature of the saltating population in wind tunnel experiments with heterogeneous size-density sands. En M.E. Brookfield y T.S. Ahlbrandt (Eds.), Aeolian Sediments and Processes. Developments in Sedimentology 38:28-41.
Herries, R.D., 1993. Contrasting styles of fluvial–aeolian interaction at the downwind erg margin: Jurassic Kayenta– Navajo transition, northeastern Arizona, U.S.A. En C.P. North y D.J. Prosser (Eds.), Characterization of Fluvial and Aeolian Reservoirs. Geological Society of London, Special Publication 73:199-218.
Hunter, R., 1977. Basic types of stratification in small dunes. Sedimentology 24:361-387. Kamola, D.L. y M.A. Chan, 1988. Coastal dune facies, Permian Cutler Formation (White Rim Sandstone), Capitol Reef National Park area, southern Utah. Sedimentary Geology 56:341-356.
Kocurek, G., 1988. First-order and super bounding surfaces in eolian sequences-bounding surfaces revisited. Sedimentary Geology 56:193-206.
Kocurek, G. y J.R. Dott, 1981. Distinctions and uses of stratification types in the interpretation of eolian sand. Journal of Sedimentary Research 51:579-595.
Kocurek, G., N.I. Robinson y J.M. Sharp jr., 2001. The response of the water table in coastal aeolian systems to changes in sea level. Sedimentary Geology 139:1-13.
Langford, R.P. y M.A. Chan, 1989. Fluvial-aeolian interactions: Part II, anciant systems. Sedimentology 36:1037-1051.
Limarino, C.O. y G. Martínez, 1992. Caracterización textural de algunas mesoformas eólicas de ambientes semidesérticos en el Bolsón de Guandacol. IV Reunión Argentina de Sedimentología Actas 2:295-302, La Plata.
Loope, D.B., C.M. Rowe y R.M. Joeckel, 2001. Annual monsoon rains recorded by Jurassic dunes. Nature 412:64-66.
Loope, D.B., J.F. Elder y M.R. Sweeney, 2012. Downslope coarsening in aeolian grainflows of the Navajo Sandstone. Sedimentary Geology 265:156-162.
López, R. y C. Clérici, 1990. Nuevos depósitos de areniscas eólicas y lacustres en la Formación De La Cuesta (Pérmico del Sistema de Famatina), provincia de Catamarca. XI Congreso Geológico Argentino Actas 2:453-456, San Juan.
Mason, C.C. y R.L. Folk, 1958. Differentiation of beach, dune, and aeolian flat environments by size analysis, Mustang Island, Texas. Journal of Sedimentary Research 28:211-226.
Matter, A., E. Neubert, F., Preusser, T. Rosenberg y K. Al-Wagdani, 2015. Palaeo-environmental implications derived from lake and sabkha deposits of the southern Rub’al-Khali, Saudi Arabia and Oman. Quaternary International 382:120-131.
McKee, E.D., 1979. Sedimentary structures in dunes. En E.D. McKee (Ed.), A Study of Global Sand Seas. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1052:83-113.
McKee, E.D., J.R. Douglass y S. Rittenhouse, 1971. Deformation of lee side laminae in eolian dunes. Geological Society of America Bulletin 82:359-378.
Mountney, N.P., 2012. A stratigraphic model to account for complexity in aeolian dune and interdune successions. Sedimentology 59:964-989.
Mountney, N.P. y A. Jagger, 2004. Stratigraphic evolution of an aeolian erg margin system: the Permian Cedar Mesa Sandstone, SE Utah, USA. Sedimentology 51:713-743.
Prosser, D.J. y R. Maskall, 1993. Permeability variation within aeolian sandstone: a case study using core cut sub-parallel to slipface bedding, the Auk Field, Central North Sea, UK. En C.P. North y D.J. Prosser (Eds.), Characterization of Fluvial and Aeolian Reservoirs, Geological Society Special Publication 73:377-397.
Pye, K., 1982. Negatively skewed aeolian sands from a humid tropical coastal dune field, northern Australia. Sedimentary Geology 31:249-266.
Salfity, J.A. y S.A. Gorustovich, 1983. Paleogeografía de la cuenca del Grupo Paganzo (Paleozoico superior). Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 38:437-453.
Schenk, C.J., 1983. Textural and structural characteristics of some experimentally formed eolian strata. En M.E. Brookfield y T.S. Ahlbrandt (Eds.), Aeolian Sediments and Processes. Developments in Sedimentology 38:28-41.
Simpson, E.L., K.A. Eriksson, P.A. Eriksson y A.J. Bumby, 2002. Eolian dune degradation and generation of massive sandstone bodies in the Paleoproterozoic Makgabeng Formation, Waterberg Group, South Africa. Journal of Sedimentary Research 72:40-45.
Spalletti, L., C.O. Limarino y F. Colombo, 2011. Internal anatomy of an erg sequence from the aeolian-fluvial system of the De La Cuesta Formation (Paganzo Basin, northwestern Argentina). Geologica Acta 8:431-447.
Stokes, L.W.M., 1968. Multiple parallel-truncation bedding planes--a feature of wind-deposited sandstone formations. Journal of Sedimentary Research 38:510-515.
Sweeny, M.R.y D.B. Loope, 2001, Holocene dune-sourced alluvial fans in the Nebraska Sand Hills: Geomorphology 38:31-46.
Tillman, L.E., 1989. Sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristics of the Nugget Sandstone (Jurassic), Painter Reservoir Field, Uinta County, Wyoming. En E.B. Coalson, S.S. Kaplan, C.W. Keighin, C.A. Oglesby y J.W. Robinson (Eds.), Petrogenesis and Petrophysics of Selected Sandstone Reservoir of the Rocky Mountain Region:97-108.
Tripaldi, A. y C.O. Limarino, 2008. Ambientes de interacción eólica-fluvial en valles intermontanos: ejemplos actuales y antiguos. Latin American Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis 15:43-66.
Turner, J.C.M., 1960. Estratigrafía del tramo medio de la Sierra de Famatina y adyacencias, La Rioja. Boletín Academia Nacional de Ciencias 42:77-126.
Turner, J.C.M., 1967. Descripción geológica de la hoja 13b, Chaschuil (provincias de Catamarca y la Rioja). Instituto Nacional de Geología y Minería, Boletín 106: 91 pp. Buenos Aires.
van den Berg E. H. y J.J. De Vries, 2003. Influence of grain fabric and lamination on the anisotropy of hydraulic conductivity in unconsolidated dune sands. Journal of Hydrology 283:244- 266.
Veiga, G.D., L.A. Spalletti y S. Flint, 2002. Aeolian/fluvial interactions and high resolution sequence stratigraphy of a non-marine lowstand wedge: the Avilé Member of the Agrio Formation (Lower Cretaceous), central Neuquén Basin, Argentina. Sedimentology 49:1001-1019.
Wilson, I.G., 1972. Aeolian bedforms-their development and origins. Sedimentology 19:173-210. Yizhaq, H., N.J. Balmforth y A. Provenzale, 2004. Blown by wind: nonlinear dynamics of aeolian sand ripples. Physica D 195:207-228.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.